you got someone specific in mind for all these questions
Lundy
nope. just a question
Thompson
okay. cause it seems pretty specific to me. maybe you should think about that
Lundy
it's just a question Thompson
Berger
anyway. i have notes on the food
Kowalski
of course you do
Berger
course three is a consomme. you clarify it, you raft it with egg white, you babysit it for hours. and the guy says he's not hungry
Fontenot
i had to stand up. a raft Berger. the man made a raft
Berger
the man made a RAFT
Hájek
the consomme is described as "rich." a consomme cannot be rich. the technique exists to make it clear. if it is rich the chef failed and the author does not know the word
Thompson
Hájek it's a metaphor
Hájek
it is a soup. soups are not metaphors. soups are soups
Marchetti
EVERYTHING in this book is a metaphor that is the whole point
Hájek
then the metaphor has the wrong viscosity
Berger
the scallops are also wrong. nonstick pan, chapter two. nonstick will not hold the heat. no crust
Fontenot
