Page 5
He hung his jacket on the hook by the door - third from the left, the same as he always did - and checked his phone. There were no missed calls or emergency texts from the theater. Brad hadn’t filed a complaint about aggressive patrons with management, which meant either he’d been too drunk to remember the encounter with the man known only as Rook, or he possessed enough self-preservation instinct to recognize when he’d been outmatched. Ethan put the odds at seventy-thirty in favor of the alcohol.
He moved through the apartment’s familiar geography. Twelve steps to the kitchen counter. Kettle filled, gas ignition clicked three times before catching. The blue flame settled into its predictable pattern while Ethan retrieved his laptop from the coffee table and opened the file he’d been maintaining since March.
Theater District Observations.xlsx
The file contained six months of data divided between seventeen tabs organized by venue, date, and incident type. What had started as an anxiety management technique - cataloging threats to create the illusion of control - had evolved into something more comprehensive.
It was also possibly a trait exhibited by someone with a paranoid tendency, but Ethan had stopped apologizing for that particular character trait around the same time he’d stopped apologizing for correcting people’s factual errors.
He navigated to the Garrison - Repeat Patrons tab and scrolled through his entries. Brad Hutchins appeared fourteen times across four months. He was showing a consistent escalation pattern: initial politeness declining into boundary violations, correlated directly with alcohol consumption and show runtime. That sort of thing was usually both predictable and manageable…until tonight.
Ethan created a new entry.
Date: October 15
Incident Type: External Intervention
Details: Brad Hutchins (see: GRP-014) cornered me outside employee entrance, 10:47 p.m. Third-party intervention by unidentified patron. Physical intimidation tactics, nonviolent resolution.
He paused, fingers hovering over the keyboard.
Additional Notes: Intervention subject displayed threat assessment inconsistent with standard patron demographics. Acknowledged own danger level. Expressed interest in attending future performances.
The kettle screamed. Ethan rescued it from the stove and poured hot water over the tea bag in his favorite mug - the one with the Metropolitan Museum of Art logo, purchased during a conference three years ago when he’d still believed an art history degree might lead somewhere besides theater concessions.
Carrying the tea back to his laptop, Ethan stared at the blinking cursor.
The problem with documentation was that it required precise details to be useful. Ethan excelled at precision, and that same precision demanded he include observations that felt simultaneously relevant and possibly absurd. He made another entry.
Subject name: Rook (no surname provided)
Appearance: Six foot two, dark hair, leather jacket with excessive hardware. Amber-gold eyes. Attractive in the specific way that suggests genetic advantages rather than effort.
Behavioral notes: Direct communication style. No boundary confusion. Acknowledged professional vs. personal distinction without requiring explanation. Claimed zero knowledge of Shakespeare but offered to attend performance anyway.
Threat assessment: High general danger. Zero specific threat to this observer.
Ethan read the last line twice, then added:
Follow-up probability: Moderate to high. Subject requested theater contact information and expressed intent to attend Thursday performance.
His phone buzzed against the counter. It was a text from one of his work colleagues, Fiona.
Fiona: home safe! thanks for checking <3
Ethan felt tension he hadn’t acknowledged release from his shoulders. He typed back:
Ethan: Good. How was dinner?
Three dots appeared, disappeared, and reappeared.
Fiona: it was fine? kind of formal for a first date tbh. he knew a LOT about my schedule
Ethan’s jaw tightened. He set down his tea and opened a new tab: Staff Concerns - External Contact.
He’d started that section in August after noticing a pattern. Theater staff - particularly younger, female-presenting employees - receiving attention from well-connected patrons. Dinner invitations. “Networking opportunities.” Modeling gigs. Event planning consultations. They were always framed as professional development opportunities, but they always felt wrong.
Ethan: Who set you up?
